🔗 Share this article

Protesters gathered outside the legislative building this week

Latvia's parliament members have decided to withdraw from an international accord created to safeguard women from abuse, including family violence, following prolonged and heated debates in the legislature.

Thousands of demonstrators gathered in the capital this past week to voice disagreement with the decision. The final authority now rests with President Edgars Rinkevics, who must determine whether to approve or veto the proposed law.

Known as the European treaty, the international accord only took effect in the Baltic state last year, requiring authorities to establish laws and support services to eliminate all types of violence.

Latvia has become the initial European Union member to initiate the process of exiting from the convention. Turkey pulled out in 2021, a move that human rights organizations characterized as a significant setback for women's rights.

Political Debate and Resistance

The international agreement was ratified by the EU in 2023, yet conservative groups have argued that its focus on equal rights weakens traditional families and advances what they term "gender ideology".

Following a thirteen-hour debate in the Saeima, MPs voted by a margin of 56-32 to exit from the treaty, a action proposed by political opponents but backed by representatives from one of the three coalition parties.

The result represents a setback for centre-right Prime Minister the nation's PM, who stood with protesters outside the legislature earlier this week. "We will not surrender, we will persist in our struggle so that abuse does not triumph," she declared to the crowd.

Ideological Disagreements and Reactions

One of the primary parties advocating for the withdrawal is a nationalist party, whose head has urged citizens to choose between what he terms a "traditional family unit" and "non-binary concepts with multiple sexes".

The nation's human rights commissioner the rights official appealed for the treaty not to be made political, while the group Equality Now stated it was "not a threat to national principles, it served as a tool to realize them".

The recent vote has provoked broad protest both within Latvia and abroad.

Twenty-two thousand individuals have signed a Latvian appeal demanding the convention to be preserved. The women's rights organization Centrs Marta has announced a demonstration for the coming week, accusing lawmakers of disregarding the wishes of the Latvian people.

International Concerns and Possible Next Steps

The head of the Council of Europe's legislative body stated that Latvia had made a rash choice fueled by false information. He described it as an "never-before-seen and deeply concerning regression for female equality and human rights in the continent".

He noted that since Turkey abandoned the treaty four years ago, cases of gender-based killings and violence against women had increased significantly.

Because the decision did not secure a two-thirds majority, the president could possibly return the legislation for additional review if he holds objections.

Head of State the national leader announced on digital platforms that he would evaluate the vote according to legal requirements, "taking into account governmental and judicial considerations, rather than ideological or political viewpoints".

Last week, another component of the ruling coalition, the Progressives, indicated it would not rule out petitioning to the supreme judicial body.

"This decision represents a worrisome situation for women's rights not only in our nation but throughout the continent," commented a human rights advocate.

• Family violence statistics have been increasing in several European nations
• The European treaty requires specific legal protections for victims of domestic abuse
• The nation's decision could influence comparable discussions in additional EU countries